Highlights | Calendar | Music | Books | Concerts | Links | Education | Health
What's New | LaRouche | Spanish Pages | Poetry | Maps
Dialogue of Cultures
Lyndon H. LaRouche Exposes
In a lengthy article posted on this website and other LaRouche related websites and publications, economist, statesman, and Democratic Presidential pre-candidate Lyndon LaRouche has provided the most comprehensive analysis to date, on the coup d'etat against the United States, that was launched by the Sept. 11 irregular-warfare attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
LaRouche's strategic study, "Zbigniew Brzezinski and Sept. 11th," reiterates and elaborates assessments that the candidate first made as the Sept. 11 attacks were unfolding, as he was being interviewed, live, on the Jack Stockwell radio show.
First and foremost, LaRouche details that the sophisticated, coordinated attacks of Sept. 11 could not have been carried out without active and witting complicity of top figures within the military and national security establishment of the United States. The form of assistance consisted either of a systematic degeneration of the entire security infrastructure of the U.S., to such an extent that the events of Sept. 11 could be planned, staged, and carried out on U.S. soil without detection, or of a circumstance in which some elements within the U.S. security command ensured that the attacks would succeed, through inside aid.
Under no circumstances, LaRouche assesses, could the attacks of Sept. 11 have been organized and directed by Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda apparatus, based out of Afghanistan.
A 'Bodyguard of Lies'
LaRouche commends President George W. Bush for his handling of the attacks of Sept. 11, particularly his collaboration with Russian President Vladimir Putin, in preventing the terror assault from triggering an escalating nuclear alert between the United States and Russia, following the direct hit on the national command center at the Pentagon. The combined efforts of Presidents Bush and Putin prevented the military coup d'etat from succeeding in its objectives: provoking an immediate global strategic military conflict, with the possible included element of a nuclear escalation between the U.S. and Russia.
However, LaRouche also criticizes the understandable decision by President Bush, late in the evening of Sept. 11, to declare that "Osama bin Laden did it," thus setting the stage for the past months' military operations in Afghanistan. While identifying Osama bin Laden and his Afghansi terror apparatus as being among the most evil forces on the planet, worthy of being dismantled, LaRouche warns that the "Osama did it" lie that was promulgated to justify the Afghan operations ensured that the actual authors of the Sept. 11 coup d'etat operation were allowed to continue, intact. Thus the "bodyguard of lies" holding bin Laden responsible for the attacks, created an even greater future danger that the military coup-plotters will have their day, and force the kind of "Clash of Civilizations" religious war across Eurasia that they so desperately seek. - Three Elements of the Coup -
To counter the danger of the ongoing coup d'etat, LaRouche spells out, in detail, the three key elements that, in combination, ran the coup.
First, LaRouche identifies the military coup-plotters themselves. Like the on-the-ground participants in the Nov. 22, 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the military/intelligence operatives involved in the Sept. 11 attacks may never be identified. Characteristically, such secret teams employ sophisticated need-to-know security procedures to conceal their identities.
Second, LaRouche focusses on the strategic-political level of the coup, involving the authors of the "Clash of Civilizations" policies on whose behalf the events of Sept. 11 were conducted. This aspect of the coup d'etat is the factor that LaRouche develops in great depth in his paper.
Third, LaRouche highlights the role of the current government of Israel, in the overall drive for a "Clash of Civilizations" war, to be detonated by Israeli actions in the Mideast.
LaRouche also emphasizes that the recent years' massive Israeli espionage against and covert-operations penetration of the United Statesincluding the U.S national security and military institutionsmay suggest a more direct Israeli involvement in the military coup activities that facilitated the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington. This apparatus, in an earlier phase of the coup actions against the United States, held former President Bill Clinton in a state of blackmail-paralysis, through its penetration of the White House secured telecommunications systems. This apparatus is part of the "Mega" network of prominent wealthy North American Zionists led by Edgar Bronfman, Ronald Lauder, Michael Steinhardt, et al., who are the leading promoters of Ariel Sharon's suicidal war drive, and who wish to draw the United States into that effort to assure a global conflagration on a scale of the First World War or worse.
The Elliott Kindergarten
LaRouche devotes the bulk of his strategic study to the second of the three integrated elements of the coup plot: the leading authors and promoters of the "Clash of Civilizations" insanity.
It is here, LaRouche observes, that the coup-plotters are most vulnerable to exposure and defeat, because the failure to provoke the "Clash" on Sept. 11 has forced them to surface more and more of their assets, to push for a broadening of the Afghan operations into "Phase II" attacks against Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and other targets. It is now transparently obvious to anyone who wishes to think clearly, that any such "Phase II" operation, particularly a military campaign to overthrow Saddam Hussein in Iraq, would lead to a religious war in the center of Eurasia, would break up the emerging Russian-American partnership, and would drive the United States into the arms of "breakaway ally" Sharon's Israel, and against the entire Arab and Islamic world.
So far, President Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell, and other top Bush Administration policy makers have avoided the "Clash of Civilizations" trap, but as LaRouche warns, that resistance will not succeed for long, unless the underlying policy axioms of the coup-plotters are revealed and roundly defeated.
It is here that research work for a forthcoming special report takes on great strategic importance. Campaign researchers have already traced the Samuel Huntington and Zbigniew Brzezinski drive for the "Clash of Civilizations" to a well-thought-out plan, fully elaborated in the 1950s at such institutions as the Harvard International Summer Seminars and the Foreign Policy Research Institute, for the United States to take the leading role in forming a new global imperium, to crush the nation-state system. The two leading architects of this imperial America policy, from the 1930s onward, were William Yandell Elliott, the Harvard mentor of Henry Kissinger, McGeorge Bundy, Huntington, and Brzezinski; and Robert Strausz-Hupe, the Austrian-born geopolitician who founded the FPRI to promote his daft American empire dogmas.
The research, to date, has established the existence of a nexus of think-tanks and tax-exempt foundations that have been devoted to the promotion of this American empire policy, particularly the drive for Huntington and Brzezinski's "Clash of Civilizations."
By shining a spotlight on this entire apparatus, LaRouche has declared his intention to defeat the still-ongoing coup d'etat, and pave the way for the revival of policies in the tradition of the American Founding Fathers and the American System of Political Economy, based on a global community of sovereign nation-states, working towards global economic developmentnot global war.Read "Zbigniew Brzezinski and Sept. 11th"
The Schiller Institute
Thank you for supporting the Schiller Institute. Your membership and contributions enable us to publish FIDELIO Magazine, and to sponsor concerts, conferences, and other activities which represent critical interventions into the policy making and cultural life of the nation and the world.
Contributions and memberships are not tax-deductible.
Home | Search | About | Fidelio | Economy | Strategy | Justice | Conferences | Join